FaSTTUBe/ams-master
58
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 2 Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

id table for slave ids #2

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-03-26 22:01:21 +01:00 by m.ruffer · 5 comments
m.ruffer commented 2025-03-26 22:01:21 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

know position of slave and where it is to help validate cooling
--> marking on the PCB?

know position of slave and where it is to help validate cooling --> marking on the PCB?
o.winkels commented 2025-03-28 17:31:01 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Da hatten wir ja mal Ideen wie man die Position automatisch erkennen könnte mit den richtigen Sensoren auf dem Slave :D Aber aktuell müsst ihr das wahrscheinlich in den Flash schreiben ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Da hatten wir ja mal Ideen wie man die Position automatisch erkennen könnte mit den richtigen Sensoren auf dem Slave :D Aber aktuell müsst ihr das wahrscheinlich in den Flash schreiben ¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯
k.bracher commented 2025-03-28 17:41:37 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

we actually know the slave ordering in the daisy chain, so if they're connected in the same order every time we would also know their positions

we actually know the slave ordering in the daisy chain, so if they're connected in the same order every time we would also know their positions
o.winkels commented 2025-03-28 17:42:46 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Good point, that makes things much easier compared to the CAN bus. Too bad, i thought the sensor solutions were quite funny

Good point, that makes things much easier compared to the CAN bus. Too bad, i thought the sensor solutions were quite funny
h.tamim commented 2025-05-05 12:58:53 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

I think a fair solution would simply be a hard coded array to identify the stacks by the AMS Slave (the ADBMS ID) currently connected and then hoping we won't replace them (lol).

alternatively we could set this array via a CAN message from the FTCU if we switched out a AMS Slave, but the first solution would suffice as a start and this could be implemented later.

I think a fair solution would simply be a hard coded array to identify the stacks by the AMS Slave (the ADBMS ID) currently connected and then hoping we won't replace them (lol). alternatively we could set this array via a CAN message from the FTCU if we switched out a AMS Slave, but the first solution would suffice as a start and this could be implemented later.
k.bracher commented 2025-05-14 19:15:07 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

The OTP BMS IDs and relative positions are now sent over CAN as of 162f58a

The OTP BMS IDs and relative positions are now sent over CAN as of 162f58a
❤️ 1
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: FaSTTUBe/ams-master#2
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?