We do not own any ref to queries when running them.
If we end up processing the query from the streaming thread, it means that it was
a serialized query, and the query is being waited to be processed on the sinkpad
streaming thread, thread which owns the reference.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/7767>
If the first buffers have no timestamp then the sink position would be
initialized to 0. The source pad might output this buffer, which would then
initialize the source position to 0 too.
Afterwards two buffers with a valid but huge timestamp might arrive before any
of them are output on the source pad. The first one would set the sink position
to a huge value, the second one would notice that the difference between the
huge value and 0 is certainly larger than max-size-time and consider the queue
as full.
Instead, simply don't update the times from buffers without timestamps and
assume whatever was set before is still valid, i.e. the buffer has the same
timestamp as the previous one.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/7071>
It is racy and may cause us to accidentally keep forwarding data past
the EOS. The only reason to stop dropping would be when we encounter a
stream-start, segment, or segment-done event, either in push_one
(already queued) or in the sink pad's event function.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/5766>
Use gst_data_queue_push_force() for most events so they
are immediately enqueued. Only gap events and actual buffer
data will now block when the queue is full.
This fixes a problem with non-flushing seek handling
where events following a segment-done event would block
if they precede the SEGMENT event, since only SEGMENT
events would clear the 'eos' state of the multiqueue
queue.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/5801>
We don't need to obtain the mutex to ensure that `sq` is non-NULL. `sq`
is assigned immediately after the pads are created and not destroyed
until the pads are finalized.
Use the pad direction to determine which internal peer we need.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/888>
Due to the dynamic nature of multiqueue, when `use-interleave` is used we can't
report a maximum tolerated latency (when queried) since it is calculated
dynamically.
When in such live pipelines, we need to make sure multiqueue can handle the
lowest global latency (provided by this event). Failure to do that would
result in not providing enough buffering for a realtime pipeline.
Fixes#1732
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/3772>
Commit d3a66f9851ea introduced a potential deadlock with two parallel release_pad
calls, where one could release the main multiqueue lock (qlock) while still
holding the reconf_lock and then calling other routines which in some conditions
may try to acquire qlock again. The second release_pad could already acquire the
qlock and then start waiting on reconf_lock, which may never be possible because
because the first one isn't releasing it until it can acquire qlock.
Fix it by holding reconf_lock for the whole durationg of qlock, making this
particular deadlock impossible.
Fixes#1642
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/3571>
When dealing with gapless input (i.e. streams with changing group-id in
GST_EVENT_STREAM_START), we need to take into account the elapsed
running-time (if applicable) in order to properly calculate levels and output
time. Without doing this all incoming data from future groups would be
considered as being "late" and would be consumed immediately.
This does **NOT** modify the actual segment and buffer times, and is only used
internally.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2784>
The mq we get out of the weak ref might be NULL if we're
shutting down, which could cause assertion failures or
crashes.
It might also cause miscompilations where the compiler just
optimises away the NULL check because it jumps to a code path
that then dereferences the pointer which clearly isn't going
to work. Seems like something like this happens with gcc 11.
Fixes#1262
Co-authored-by: Doug Nazar <nazard@nazar.ca>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Dröge <sebastian@centricular.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2599>
Fixes:
../plugins/elements/gstmultiqueue.c: In function ‘gst_multi_queue_loop’:
../plugins/elements/gstmultiqueue.c:2394:19: warning: ‘is_query’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
2394 | if (object && !is_query)
| ^~~~~~~~~
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2593>
In the case where not all streams have received any data, growing the interleave
by only 100ms is too restrictive and would cause some (valid) mpeg-ts streams to
hang.
Bump up the interleave growth rate for those use-cases to 500ms per input (still
up to the limit of 5s).
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2370>
This commit modifies the interleave calculation to allow growing when incoming
data is before the segment start.
The rationale is that there is no requirement whatsoever for data before the
segment start to be "coherent" on all streams.
For example, a demuxer could rightfully send data from the video stream from the
previous keyframe (potentially quite a bit before the segment start) and the
audio from just before the segment start.
This will activate the same logic as growing the interleave when some streams
haven't received buffers yet.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/1892>
* When a stream receives EOS, it will no longer change, we shouldn't take that
stream into account for interleave calculation.
* When streams (re)appear, we do not want to grow the initial interleave values
to excessive values. Instead of setting it to a default of 5s, progressively
grow it to that maximum.
* When the status of input streams change (i.e. going to/from "some haven't
received data yet" and "all have received data"), update the interleave
immediately instead of waiting for (potentially) 5s of data before updating
it.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/1892>
If the query has already been destroyed at this point, GST_IS_QUERY will
read garbage, can return false and we will try to unref it again.
Instead, make note of whether the item is a query when we dequeue it.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/1029>
