FaSTTUBe/GST-Tensordecoder-ov_ep
37
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

splitmuxsink: Don't need to trace next timecode for split decision

Browse Source 
Since the commit 94bb76b6b9c48981d3ad42a8c4370b9658db4229, splitmuxsink
will split fragments based on queued time and the threshold of that.
So don't need to store the next timecode for split decision.
This commit is contained in:
Seungha Yang 2020-03-25 21:01:00 +09:00
parent d1501f0952
commit 6256fc67e4
1 changed files with 5 additions and 20 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
gst/multifile/gstsplitmuxsink.c
View File

@ -566,7 +566,6 @@ gst_splitmux_sink_init (GstSplitMuxSink * splitmux)
splitmux->split_requested = FALSE;
splitmux->do_split_next_gop = FALSE;
splitmux->times_to_split = gst_queue_array_new_for_struct (8, 8);
splitmux->next_max_tc_time = GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE;
splitmux->last_fku_time = GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE;
}
@ -712,7 +711,6 @@ gst_splitmux_sink_set_property (GObject * object, guint prop_id,
g_free (splitmux->threshold_timecode_str);
/* will be calculated later */
splitmux->threshold_timecode = GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE;
splitmux->next_max_tc_time = GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE;
g_clear_pointer (&splitmux->tc_interval,
gst_video_time_code_interval_free);
@ -1385,9 +1383,10 @@ request_next_keyframe (GstSplitMuxSink * splitmux, GstBuffer * buffer,
}
splitmux->last_fku_time = target_time;
if (timecode_based && !GST_CLOCK_TIME_IS_VALID (splitmux->next_max_tc_time)) {
splitmux->next_max_tc_time = next_max_tc_time;
if (timecode_based && !GST_CLOCK_TIME_IS_VALID (splitmux->threshold_timecode)) {
splitmux->threshold_timecode = next_max_tc_time - running_time;
GST_DEBUG_OBJECT (splitmux, "Calculated threshold timecode duration %"
GST_TIME_FORMAT, GST_TIME_ARGS (splitmux->threshold_timecode));
}
ev = gst_video_event_new_upstream_force_key_unit (target_time, TRUE, 0);
@ -2082,10 +2081,8 @@ need_new_fragment (GstSplitMuxSink * splitmux,
}
/* 5us possible rounding error was already accounted around keyframe request */
if (splitmux->next_max_tc_time != GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE &&
(queued_time >= splitmux->threshold_timecode ||
splitmux->reference_ctx->in_running_time >=
splitmux->next_max_tc_time)) {
if (splitmux->threshold_timecode != GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE &&
(queued_time >= splitmux->threshold_timecode)) {
GST_TRACE_OBJECT (splitmux, "Splitting at timecode mark");
return TRUE; /* Timecode threshold */
}
@ -2162,12 +2159,6 @@ handle_gathered_gop (GstSplitMuxSink * splitmux)
GST_LOG_OBJECT (splitmux, "mq at TS %" GST_STIME_FORMAT
" bytes %" G_GUINT64_FORMAT, GST_STIME_ARGS (queued_time), queued_bytes);
if (splitmux->next_max_tc_time != GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE) {
GST_LOG_OBJECT (splitmux,
"timecode mq TS %" GST_TIME_FORMAT " vs target %" GST_TIME_FORMAT,
GST_TIME_ARGS (splitmux->reference_ctx->in_running_time),
GST_TIME_ARGS (splitmux->next_max_tc_time));
}
/* Check for overrun - have we output at least one byte and overrun
* either threshold? */
@ -2193,11 +2184,6 @@ handle_gathered_gop (GstSplitMuxSink * splitmux)
new_out_ts = splitmux->reference_ctx->in_running_time;
splitmux->fragment_start_time = splitmux->gop_start_time;
splitmux->fragment_total_bytes = 0;
/* this means we are fragmenting based on timecode. Update next tc time
* to the running time of previously requested keyframe */
if (GST_CLOCK_TIME_IS_VALID (splitmux->next_max_tc_time))
splitmux->next_max_tc_time = splitmux->last_fku_time;
}
/* And set up to collect the next GOP */
@ -3288,7 +3274,6 @@ gst_splitmux_sink_reset (GstSplitMuxSink * splitmux)
g_atomic_int_set (&(splitmux->split_requested), FALSE);
g_atomic_int_set (&(splitmux->do_split_next_gop), FALSE);
splitmux->next_max_tc_time = GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE;
splitmux->last_fku_time = GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE;
gst_queue_array_clear (splitmux->times_to_split);